Mountaintop removal coal mining and the "clean coal" oxymoron Stop mountain top removal coal mining - Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
 
OVEC lists details and contact information for environmentally related events throughout the area
Complete index of OVEC target issues (or click below to go directly to a primary issue)
Mountain Top Removal (articles, reports, links, etc.)
Slurry Impoundment (articles, reports, links, etc.)
Election Campaign Finance Reform (articles, reports, links, etc.)
 
OVEC Action Alerts and associated information
 
OVEC publishes a newsletter reporting on environmental issues and activism
 
Recent Press Releases and other information relevant to the press
 
Links to other websites
 
Links to environmental news on the web
 
Takes you to a complete list of galleries
Galleries depicting the devastation caused by Mountaintop Removal
Photos of so-called reclamation
Articles and  Photo Galleries of Environmental Activism
The zen of flowers - after viewing photos of the ongoing mountaintop removal disaster, calm your nerves with the flower of the day
 
Information about OVEC's roots
 
Hover over primary links in the side or top navigation bars for description of the link - click here for more site navigation notes
 


Sept. 23: The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va. hears the oral arguments in a mountaintop removal case filed by the Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment, OVEC, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and Coal River Mountain Watch.

According to the Charleston Gazette:

Coal industry lawyers and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are appealing two related rulings by U.S. District Judge Robert C. Chambers to curb mountaintop removal. In a March 23, 2007, ruling, Chambers concluded that the corps had not fully evaluated the potential environmental damage before approving four Massey Energy strip-mining permits. Citing the "alarming cumulative stream loss" to valley fills, Chambers ruled that the corps needed more to more thoughtfully consider a mine's potential impacts before granting a permit.

"Coal mining has long been part of the fabric of Appalachian life, providing jobs to support workers and their families and energy to fuel the nation," Chambers wrote.

"Unfortunately, coal mining also extracts a toll on the natural environment. In particular, the mining technique at issue in these permits potentially results in dramatic environmental consequences."

In a second ruling on June 13, Chambers concluded that the Clean Water Act does not allow coal operators to build in-stream sediment ponds at the bottom of valley fills.

Coal industry lawyers argue in their appeal that Chambers' ruling "cripples West Virginia's coal production" and that new permits have "slowed to a standstill" in the state's southern coalfields.

Federal government lawyers argue that the corps properly studied mining's impacts and that Chambers should have deferred to the agency.

Gov. Joe Manchin joined in the appeal, with two of his agencies filing "friend of the court" briefs at the 4th Circuit.

This is the fourth major mountaintop removal ruling by a federal judge in West Virginia to go before the Richmond, Va.-based appeals court. Appeals court panels have overturned the three previous rulings that required tougher regulation of mining.

 

 

   Smart Counter Details   OVEC Home   Issues   Contact   Join   Site Map