Mar 092013
 

Beauty and the Coal Beast

A March 8 post in “Grounded,” The State Journal’s energy blog, vice president of the West Virginia Coal Association, and notorious funny man, Chris Hamilton was quoted saying that some West Virginia delegates might not know “the difference between a dragline and a drag queen.” He made these remarks at a recent coal industry conference where he and his fellow industry officials trotted out their bought and paid for members of the West Virginia House of Delegates.

The blog reads:

Hamilton said “It’s a hell of a lot easier” when someone passionate about the industry not only listens, but seeks industry support on legislation. Hamilton said in addition to passion, these delegates bring a knowledge of the industry. He said sometimes a “teacher” or “librarian”delegate speaks up to a coal-related bill and might not even know “the difference between a dragline and a drag queen.”

But we got to wondering, does Chris even know the difference?  After all, draglines are huge and hideous and drag queens are fierce, beautiful, and fabulous people.  They shouldn’t even be compared in the same sentence together.  And to the best of our knowledge, there has never been a 260 ft. tall drag queen that has destroyed an entire mountain while poisoning Appalachian streams and making people sick. We don’t think many drag queens would knowingly and willingly put people’s lives at risk for profit.  No, that would be the coal industry and their ugly giant mechanical beasts like the dragline. How could anyone not know the difference, right?

Silly Guy! Sometimes Chris, things you say could almost be funny… almost.

Why do legislators continue to listen to coal industry lobbyists who insult their intelligence and the LGBT community?

I Love Mountains and Equality

Feb 222013
 
Empowering ourselves on an issue in today’s noisy world requires work.  I have been addressing mountaintop removal  strip mining (MTR) since 1998, and am convinced the next two years are very important in bringing this issue out of our comfort zone and just as firmly into national consciousness as possible.  We’ve been terribly nice in stopping this destruction to this point…I think it’s truly time to step up.

MTR is hazardous to humans and other living things. Photo by Vivian Stockman. Flyover scourtesy SouthWings.org

MTR is hazardous to humans and other living things.
Photo by Vivian Stockman. Flyover courtesy SouthWings.org

Social media provides a whole new toolbox of creative ways to network and get people thinking about MTR.  WhiteHouse.gov is also allowing petitions online as part of their effort to help grassroots efforts.  Well, it feels important to realize that even if we are successful in getting the one hundred thousand signatures that would compel the Whitehouse to comment on MTR,  that is not guarantee that we would like their answer.   What to do!

A petition on “We the People” is posted for 30 days.  Regardless of the number of signatures we arrive at on any single petition,  the petitions are a great way network among anyone who will listen and keep the issue in front of their eyes, and hopefully in their minds.   With this in mind, please sign the latest petition to help stop MTR.  I will be coordinating with others to change the wording over the months, and intend on starting a new petition very month, for at least the next two years.

Is it as easy as that?  Well no.  I am only one person.  The idea is based on the premise that those who feel passionate about stopping MTR might be willing to network in just as many ways as possible to get the petitions in front of readers’ eyes, without being aggravating or overbearing.

Please help by signing the latest petition, but more importantly please work this effort by sharing it on social media sites; and, exercising your networking abilities.  Actually, this repeated petition idea, is in fact a great way to increase the validity of our networks beyond the petitions.

Here’s a link to the February 15 petition.

Warm regards, Al Justice.

Feb 142013
 
OVEC’s Maria Gunnoe with Daryl Hannah at the F13 rally. Photo by the Sierra Club’s Mary Anne Hitt

OVEC’s Maria Gunnoe
with Daryl Hannah at the F13 rally.
Photo by the Sierra Club’s Mary Anne Hitt

OVEC's Maria Gunnoe and 350.org's Bill McKibben at the F13 rally. Photo by the Sierra Club's Mary Anne Hitt.

OVEC’s Maria Gunnoe
and 350.org’s Bill McKibben at the F13 rally.
Photo by the Sierra Club’s Mary Anne Hitt

Several OVEC members and staff are heading to Washington D.C. for the largest climate rally in history, happening this Sunday, February 17. If you can’t join us in person, please join the rally online. Hashtags in use for the rally include #forwardonclimate, #f17. With your tweets please include #(your zip code), so we get a view of the support from our area. OVEC will be trying to tweet from the event. Follow OVEC here and me here.

In a lead-in event to the rally, OVEC organizer Maria Gunnoe was among 48 people arrested outside the White House yesterday. Their focus was on the Keystone tar sands pipeline and what approval of the pipeline will mean for the climate. As a follow up to that action, please call President Obama to tell him to reject Keystone XL.

Like tar sands extraction, mountaintop removal is climate ground zero. Here’s Maria’s statement from yesterday:

President Obama must end mountaintop removal coal mining. Coal kills from the cradle to the grave. It’s a climate catastrophe and a personal one. We in Appalachia know firsthand what it means when the coal industry moves in and takes over your community. Energy companies and government agencies uproot and pollute the land, air and water that sustains all our lives, with energy as their excuse. This simply is not an acceptable plan for our children’s future. We deserve a healthy energy plan. One that ends mountaintop removal coal mining and its deadly impacts on Appalachian people. No one should have to die for electricity in America.

We’ve collected links to many of the news stories generated from yesterday’s action here (look for the tornado and fist icons).

It’s interesting that these arrests were happening the very day that, 100 years ago, Mother Jones was arrested in Charleston, W.Va. Her arrest helped bring national attention to the plight of coal miners’ working conditions.

Meanwhile, on this St. Valentine’s Day, if you aren’t already in Kentucky for I Love Mountains Day, show your love by joining the event online.

Also, show Maria a little love by helping to garner as many signatures as you can ASAP on her petition here. The deadline for the petition is tomorrow.

Oct 302012
 

Wow! Happy 25th Birthday OVEC!

Let’s all eat cake!

 

Who would have thought that OVEC would still be going strong considering our humble beginnings—a small committed group of people that stood up, spoke out and said “NO” to a major polluter? But here we all are, together celebrating a significant milestone in OVEC’s life— 25 years of hard-won successes.

Photo

Crystal Good’s reading of BoomBoom wowed the crowd.

 

We want you to know that we couldn’t have done any of this important work without the thousands of supporters who have been standing with us—and if you are reading this, you must be one of them. We hope you know that you, our members, volunteers, sustaining members, major donors and foundations share in every victory—both large and small. You are the life-blood of OVEC—generous, heart-centered, and committed to environmental justice, as well as clean air, water and land. Thank you!

We know that the only way to overcome the power of organized money is through the power of organized people—a core belief that has been the basis for our many real-world victories. In our early years, with OVEC’s assistance, citizens took leadership in their communities and successfully prevented major new toxic pollution sources in the Huntington Tri-State area and forced dramatic pollution reductions at the former Ashland Oil refinery on the Kentucky-West Virginia border. For 5 years, OVEC organized and led a coalition of groups, as well as hundreds of OVEC members which prevented the construction of the biggest dioxin-spewing pulp mill in North America in Apple Grove, West Virginia.

Appalachia Rising: The power of organized people!

In our quarter of a century life, we’ve learned that major victories are not won overnight. That’s why OVEC also believes in “endless pressure, endlessly applied.” Major pollution reductions at the Ashland Oil refinery took over twelve years of citizen organizing and toxic tort litigation. Standing with impacted communities, OVEC has been fighting mountaintop removal mining and other abuses of the coal industry for fifteen years. While we haven’t won yet, your loyal support has allowed us to stand our ground against injustices perpetrated by a politically powerful coal industry.

Bottom right is what remains of Jarrell family cemetery. Flight courtesy of Southwings (www.southwings.org).

A story aired on MetroNews radio prior to our celebration.  You can read about it here:

http://www.wvmetronews.com/news.cfm?func=displayfullstory&storyid=55884

You can read more about our celebration here:

http://www.herald-dispatch.com/features/x746103258/Huntington-non-profit-OVEC-celebrates-25-years-this-weekend

Today, while we continue to grieve and stand with those who still suffer the day-to-day assaults of mountaintop removal mining, we can take some solace in knowing that without our efforts, there would be many more active mountaintop removal mines now operating in West Virginia. Again, we want to express deepest gratitude to all of you— our faithful dues-paying members and hard-working volunteers, our board members and partner organizations, and all the attorneys who work with us providing significant time, energy, and resources to help save our precious mountains, streams and communities.

Blackwater Canyon

 

None of us knows what the future holds for OVEC, but we can all reflect with satisfaction knowing that OVEC’s presence in West Virginia has made a significant positive impact on the quality of life and the environment. We know with your continued support, we can forge a new vision for the state’s future—a future where all people are respected and valued, that preserves our mountain ecosystems and unique culture, is truly democratic, inclusive and, sustainable. That’s a tall order, but with your continued support, we can do this together.

Onward and upward!
Janet Keating, Executive Director
Dianne Bady, OVEC Founder and Co-Director

Aug 292012
 

Imagine: you move to a new community and discover at least half of the residents have brain tumors, and that there is a forty percent greater likelihood that babies born into this community will suffer from serious birth defects compared to their peers in other communities. Would you want to know what is causing all of these illnesses? Of course you would! Similarly, if you lived in a community where strange substances start to creep into your water supply, you would want to know what is going on.

These are just some of the challenges that residents of this state face when they live near mountaintop removal and gas fracking operations. The health concerns resulting from these two industries are pervasive and widespread. Read more about the growing body of scientific evidence about these health problems here.

It’s high time that we start making connections between the health problems faced by community members who live near both mountaintop removal coal mining and deep well gas drilling operations. A big step forward in this endeavor is our Water and Wellness conference, to be held September 8, in Morgantown, W.Va.

Through a range of discussions and panels, you will learn about the extreme human health impacts of mountaintop removal coal mining and deep shale gas drilling and fracking. Meet with impacted residents and experts including: keynote speaker, Wilma Subra; Dr. Ben Stout, whom you may have seen in The Last Mountain and Burning the Future; Dr. Jill Kriesky; and Dr. Michael Hendryx, whose research is shining a much-needed light on these health impacts.

Read more about this event here, and register here.

Jul 202012
 

A year ago, I couldn’t have imagined going to Rio de Janiero, Brazil, let alone going there to participate in the UN Conference on Sustainable Development, known as Rio+20. But it happened this June, and I did it. While I have many reflections on the city and the numerous events, one experience I want to lift up is my journey up Corcovado to see the iconic Christ the Redeemer statue which watches over that marvelous city. My travel guidebook, tells me that Corcovado is the name of the mountain on which this remarkable monument resides—named after its shape (corcova) which in Portuguese means hunchback. I learned that in 2007, this art-deco style monument was named one of the “New Seven Wonders of the World.” My guess is that nearly everyone who travels to Rio makes the pilgrimage to this mountaintop to take in both the impressive statue and the view.

From the taxi ride to my hotel upon arriving in Brazil, until the last ride back to the international airport, I could see the 98-foot tall statue of Jesus with welcoming arms outstretched. I saw it first from the window of my fellow-travelers’ hotel room from downtown Rio and then again, out my hotel window a twenty minute taxi ride away from the central part of the city— bathed in green light at night, most likely in deference to the U. N. Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio+20. Ubiquitous, beckoning, and somehow comforting, it seemed.

For me one of the best parts of Rio is its imposing mountains, next to my second favorite habitat—the beach. Those mountains were giants against the sky, towering over the city, its inhabitants and visitors. Some were totally forested; others were almost completely covered with small houses—the colorful small homes of those of lesser means—neighborhoods known as the favelas. People living in the favelas were generally employed to serve those more fortunate, who lived adjacent in the newer high-rise apartments. Some served tourists in the hotels, restaurants or bars while others depended on warm sunny days on the beaches of Copacabana or Ipanema to sell their wares. And all of these little houses were electrified—a constant reminder to me that the influence of the developed world. Technology in our modern American culture, whether good or bad for the planet, has become a yardstick for progress for much of the rest of the world.

Sally Dunne from the Loretto Community NGO at the United Nations, her intern Emily Thenhaus and I took the opportunity to head to Corcovado the day after Rio+ 20 ended. A long taxi ride across town took us past Lake “Rodrigo de Frietas” and eventually to the streets of Cosme Vehlo, the neighborhood where “pilgrims” to the mountaintop catch a little tram to the summit. Upon arrival, we did what we had grown accustomed to doing during most of the conference—we waited. Our tram wouldn’t be leaving for about an hour. But waiting for anything in this new-found, fascinating place, would be nothing but a pleasure for me.

Sally and Emily decided to explore the local neighborhood. I chose to stay nearby and watch for any new birds I might see. Interestingly, one of the first I saw was the House Sparrow. Yep. The same alien weaver finch that we have—having made its way from England to Brazil—a common city dweller, a generalist that can adapt to most places, and eats all kinds of junk food. I strolled down to the little park beside the tram station and settled in. I kept hearing new bird sounds and was surrounded by so many interesting people—some locals, others obviously tourists like me. Satisfied with identifying a Swallow-tailed Hummingbird, I made my wait back to our appointed meet-up place.

Soon we were in line for our ride up the mountain. The little red tram had two cars; I estimated about 40 people fit in each one. We scrambled onto a nearly full car and took the first available seats. Most of the window seats—premium for catching the views of Rio below—were already taken. As the tram began to wind its way slowly up the 2,000+ foot mountain, I found myself overwhelmed emotionally by feelings of grief. I fought back my tears. Why was all this emotion welling up in me?

Then it dawned on me. What a contrast to West Virginia! How could it be that our mountains at home were being tortured and obliterated via mountaintop removal strip mining of coal, while this mountain, Corcovado, was so venerated? I’ve not checked it out, but I suspect there’s no coal under the summit of Corcovado. As we chugged our way to the top I thought about why it is that we are we drawn to these high places—places with expansive views. Beyond their incomprehensible beauty, mountains are magical. Can the human heart be transformed by such a pilgrimage? Do we sense that they are they sacred places? Is it only for the view or could it be a place to gain greater perspective on our own lives? When a person can see for miles and miles, when this god-like perspective makes miniatures of everything below, do we unconsciously and simultaneously experience a sense of being finitely small yet somehow great? Indeed, when I reached this summit, I was overcome by wonderful emotions—joy and peace. Although Corcovado is crowded with sight-seers, alone in my thoughts, I was awestruck by this great geologic monument—a fraction of God’s Great Opus.
I descend with only more questions: Who calculates the intrinsic value of a mountaintop? And who, with any self- examination, could destroy one?

If you’re reading this and love mountains, you can do something to help save some mountains in southern West Virginia.  Contact President Obama here:  http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/write-or-call and tell him he needs to place an immediate moratorium on mountaintop removal in Central Appalachia.

Corcovado as seen from Copacabana Beach, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Jun 142012
 

Freshly shorn Rebecca Park with her daughter Beth Ann Bolte. Photo by Andy Park.

A Guest Blog from Charleston, W.Va. resident Rebbeca Park

I have taken a stand against mountaintop removal (MTR). I joined with about a dozen others at the West Virginia State Capitol on Memorial Day and with my mom and my husband Andy watching, I let my daughter Beth Ann buzz my hair down to stubble. As you may imagine, since that moment I have been unable to forget my commitment to this issue! And it has helped me start conversations with complete strangers to hear their thoughts.

Here is an explanation of why I am doing this, and an invitation for you to add your voice to mine (without the loss of your hair).

As a mining method, MTR destroys habitats over thousands of acres as the ridges are clearcut and dynamited. I think of my dad when I see these places and know that he would have grieved for what is destroyed.

Then the rock over the coal seam is pushed into valleys, burying more habitats and disrupting the normal patterns of drainage. Perhaps the worst effect on the people who manage to continue living in the area is the damage to family wells and leaching of heavy metals into their groundwater. And if their narrow valleys flood, the burden of proving that MTR has created or even contributed to the devastation is left to these flood victims.

Residents must also contend with the effects of nearby blasting, heavy dust, heavy equipment on their roads, intimidation if they do not want to sell their property, and the obliteration of their communities. Impoundment ponds (such as the one in the disaster on Buffalo Creek, Logan County and the Martin County KY sludge spill in 2000) are still used to collect the sludge from the washing of the coal, which is not just a nuisance, but is full of poisonous chemicals.

All of this is accomplished with a small percentage of the workforce that would be hired for underground mining. Southern West Virginia does depend on coal for employment, but by arguing that MTR is necessary for those jobs, the industry people are actually lying, because MTR reduces jobs. Drastically.

There are other methods of mining but the industry finds MTR the cheapest method, not just by reducing the labor force, but also because our government under the Bush Administration did not enforce rules and even changed the rules to reducie the coal industry’s responsibilities.

Any industry that ruins and pollutes and then moves on leaves the real costs of their methods to the future, in clean-ups and health care. And in this case, all this devastation is wreaked for maybe 30 more years of cheap air conditioning and lighting locally and cheap energy for industry here and in China and India. Why are we in such a hurry to extract our precious coal and what will become of us in, say 50 years?

This is a liquidation of one of our most important resources, meaning coal becomes cash and guess where the cash goes! Even while they cry about the obstacles to profits, Arch Coal, for instance, raked in $10s of millions in net income in 2011.

There are rules in place, but permits are handled in bits and pieces so that huge projects seem smaller and the total impact is not part of the official discussion. And during the required “hearings” citizens find they are… well simply, not being heard. No matter how well prepared any concerned citizens are, and how respectful they are of the process, there is an attitude that RESIDENTS are the OUTSIDERS to the process, that the industry is right, and objections from the little people are, at most, annoying.

The federal EPA and the state DEP have been pinched between the protective work they need to do and the obvious coal-interests of our elected government–our Congress people, our governor, our legislature. We all know that elections cannot be won anymore with out treasure chests of money, and now entire campaigns can be run for a candidate through super PACs, with unlimited funding from corporations.

The argument to allow mountaintop removal to continue is couched in language like “Obama’s War on Coal,” “Obama’s No Job Zone,” and the stupidly simple alternatives on the bumper stickers “Support coal or sit in the dark.”

More accurately, President Obama has declared a war on pollution. Jobs in mining have increased since the Bush administration. And we CAN insist that coal be mined responsibly, we CAN support pollution control, we CAN support alternative technologies and we CAN conserve electricity. It’s not the either-or light on-lights off situation that the Friends of Coal bumper stickers want to make it.

We have LOTS of choices and alternatives, if we are free to come together and map out the future of the coalfields and determine our energy picture. IF we are listened to. IF we raise our voices instead of being silenced by the money that rents the billboards, buys university athletics, buys our government.

I am for electricity (and for coal mining, though not everyone in this movement is) but I am against mountaintop removal as a method of mining.

Please consider adding your voice to this groundswell of public opinion. Call your representatives in Congress (202-224-3121) and ask them to co-sponsor and support the Clean Water Protection Act, HR 1375. More ideas for speaking up can be found at this really cool website, which is the Alliance for Appalachia website. OVEC is a member of The Alliance.

Jun 132012
 

This Joel Pett cartoon appeared in the Lexington Herald-Leader on Sunday, June 10

If you haven’t already, please take a few minutes to read this Sunday, June 10 Lexington Herald-Leader editorial, “EPA should hang tough in coalfields.” The paper also published the Joel Pett cartoon, at right, that day.

The editorial tells the story of what happened to OVEC organizer Maria Gunnoe on Capitol Hill on June 1. And it asks that she receive a public apology, as does the staff at the Goldman Prize, the “Green Nobel,” which Maria won in 2009.

In his home district and beyond, Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO) and his staff on the House Natural Resources Committee have been receiving some bad press about the horrid incident.

The Congressional Record for the June 1 hearing is open for two more days. This is a public record, and according to House rules, the public is free to submit letters, documents, and information for the Congressional record of any hearing.

So here’s your chance to turn your outrage over what happened to Maria — a woman who is trying to save our homeplaces, and protect kids and families here – into action.

Write a letter now to the committee and to Mr. Lamborn for the Congressional Record.  Insist on a public apology to the family of the young child in the photo, the photographer and to Maria Gunnoe, whom the committee outrageously detained for police investigation because she wanted the committee to see the photo of a little girl force to bathe in toxic coal pollution. Make sure to include that you wish for your letter to be entered into the Congressional record of the hearing, otherwise your comments won’t be included in the record.

This statement should do the trick:  I wish to submit the following letter for the public Congressional record of the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing on Friday, June 1, 2012, at 10:00 AM, entitled “The Obama Administration’s Actions Against the Spruce Coal Mine: Canceled Permits, Lawsuits and Lost Jobs.”

Send your letter to:  naturalresources@mail.house.gov

Let’s hold Mr. Lamborn and his staff accountable for their sorry actions. Let’s tell his committee that we won’t allow them to continue to deny and distort the truth while taking Big Coal’s dirty money, which it makes from destroying communities, blowing up mountains, and harming families and children, like the one in the photo that Mr. Lamborn refuses to look at. Remember you have until 5 p.m. (Eastern-time) this Friday, June 15 to submit your comments.

Please take the time now to write your message to the committee to tell the members how you feel about how they behaved toward award-winning mountain hero Maria Gunnoe.

Update: Maria says Representative Doc Hastings also needs to be issuing apologies. Please include him in your communication. You can also contact him directly here.

Below are some ideas for messages you could send, but your own words are always the best!

To Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Hastings and House Natural Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee staff:

I wish to submit the following letter for the public Congressional record of the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing on Friday, June 1, 2012, at 10:00 AM, entitled “The Obama Administration’s Actions Against the Spruce Coal Mine: Canceled Permits, Lawsuits and Lost Jobs.”

– What is dirty about the photo you refused to allow in the record is the water – and the practice of mountaintop removal that is making people sick and destroying their water. You can deny that reality all you want but that won’t make it go away.

– Mr Lamborn, Mr. Hastings – I hope you saw the editorial of June 10 in the Lexington paper about your committee’s offensive behavior.  I would like to submit it for the hearing record. (if you choose something along these lines, be sure to include the text of the editorial, available at the link up top).

Send a bathtub photo of your own kids if you have one.  If your baby is not bathing in filth, the message could be something like, “This is my son in the tub.  Fortunately for us, he has clean water in which to bath because we do not live downstream from mountaintop removal.  Please enter this photo and my message for the record of the June 1 subcommittee hearing on the Spruce mine.  If you think this photo of my baby is also pornography you can tell the Capitol Police how to find me.” 

– Mr Lamborn, Mr. Hastings – I hope you saw the editorial cartoon of June 10 in the Lexington paper. As they say, a picture can say a thousand words.  Since you denied the right of citizen activist Maria Gunnoe to place the photo of the girl bathing in mining-polluted water in your committee’s hearing record, I ask that you include this editorial cartoon in the hearing record.

Jun 062012
 

Congressman Doug Lamborn (middle) (R-CO) stares at Maria Gunnoe (hair only visible in foreground, left) during another hearing his committee hosted on Sept. 26, 2011 in Charleston, W.Va. More info here: http://ohvec.org/newsletters/woc_2011_12/. Photo by Vivian Stockman.

“I accept the judgment of professional staff,” Lamborn said Tuesday. “If it’s inappropriate, I don’t think I should be viewing it. The fewer people who viewed it, the better.”

That from Rep. Lamborn in a Denver Post article this morning titled  “Rep. Lamborn panel blocks bath photo over child-porn concerns.

He also said, “If it’s inappropriate, I don’t think I should be viewing it. The fewer people who viewed it, the better.”

Guess that backfired.

The Colorado Springs Gazette ran a story, too, “Lamborn panel axes photo of child bathing in polluted water,” and it’s among the paper’s “most viewed” stories so far today.

Remember, today is the National End Mountaintop Removal Call-In Day.  Please make the call.

If you tweet, please follow us @OVEC_WV and re-tweet about the call-in day.

Jun 052012
 

Congressman Doug Lamborn (middle) (R-CO) stares at Maria Gunnoe (hair only visible in foreground, left) during another hearing his committee hosted on Sept. 26, 2011 in Charleston, W.Va. More info here: http://ohvec.org/newsletters/woc_2011_12/. Photo by Vivian Stockman.

According to a June 1 Politico article titled “Hill Republicans alert cops to activist’s ‘inappropriate’ photo” by Bob King and Erica Martinson:

Committee Republican spokesman Spencer Pederson said subcommittee Chairman Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.) “determined that that picture was inappropriate for committee use.” Pederson said full committee Chairman Doc Hastings (R-Wash.) agreed.

“Due to the nature of the photograph, senior committee staff made the decision to contact the U.S. Capitol Police and apprise them of the situation,” Pederson told POLITICO. “Capitol Police asked for a printed copy of the email and photograph, which was provided. As the photograph was inappropriate for a congressional hearing, committee staff notified the witness it would not be publicly displayed.

The Politico article is available to PoliticoPro subscribers here.

This Mother Jones post has an excellent summary of what went down.

Update:  Congressman Lamborn’s staff is telling reporters that they did not request that the photo be barred from Maria’s testimony.  They say that was the recommendation of the Natural Resources Committee staff, who approached the Congressman with their recommendation and he accepted their recommendation without looking at the photo.