Jun 282012
 

A guest blog by OVEC membership committee member Sylvia Arthur

When it comes to elections many times we are faced with the same questions. Who is this person?” “What are their policies?” “What is their background?”

I would like to show you a few good web sites where you can get information about candidates for the up coming elections.

1. One of the first sites to come on line was Project Vote Smart. It is a 501(c)(3) educational organization funded exclusively through contributions from private citizens and philanthropic foundations. The site is very easy to navigate. You can locate all your representatives, from national to state, through their Voter Self Defense System. Put in your address to get instant access to your representative’s biography, voting record, interest group ratings, issue positions, public statements and campaign finances.

Project Vote Smart will give you information about Federal, State elections. They have a Vote Easy interactive program that matches your stand on issues with the 2012 Presidential candidates. They also have a Vote Smart Ambassador program. Interested persons can receive information about Project Vote Smart to share in their communities. You can also get candidate information by phone at 1-888-VOTESMART.

2. Congress.org is another early site for following legislators and legislation. It is a nonpartisan news and information website dedicated to encouraging civic participation. On the bottom of the home page there is a link for Elections 2012, where you may explore candidates and get advice on how to talk with your legislator.

Drawing from the newsroom of CQ Roll Call, the largest news organization on Capitol Hill, the website provides daily coverage of the public policy issues being discussed by your lawmakers. Their weekly MegaVote email newsletter makes it easy to track how your representatives are voting. You can write all of your elected officials at one time.

3. A final tip is to Google the search phrase “choose your candidate.” There are programs out there that are similar to VoteEasy. Answer a few questions and the program will match you with the candidate with views most similar to yours.

Do you have any favorite spots that you like to go to for information about candidates? Let us know, e-mail vivian@ohvec.org and she’ll pass the info along to me for possible future blog postings.

Stayed tuned for another posting with more information on tracking representatives who are already seated.

Jun 252012
 

I’m still amazed after all these years the number of times that I seem to be in the right place at the right time. That was the case on June 21st at the UN Conference, Rio+20 in Rio de Janiero, Brazil. I was sitting in the Women’s group office hand-writing some notes for the presentation I would be giving later about mountaintop removal and the Central Appalachian Women’s Tribunal on Climate Justice.  That was the recent event that OVEC helped organize in mid-May.   While sitting there, Rosa Lizarde, the global coordinator for the Feminist Task Force, introduced me to Claire Greensfelder,a lifelong environmental, peace and safe energy activist, educator, political campaigner, and print and radio journalist, who lives and works in California.

What a small world we live in.  When she found out that I was from West Virginia, working on ending mountaintop removal coal mining, she asked me if I knew Mike Roselle.

And of course I do!  His group has done so much to raise public awareness about this extreme and highly destructive type of strip mining.

She went on to compliment Mike and his work with Climate Ground Zero.  Rosa then told her that OVEC had been the primary organizing group on the ground for the Women’s Tribunal, at which point, Claire asked if I knew that the U.S. EPA’s Administrator, Lisa Jackson was speaking the next day at Rio Centro (where the UN plenaries and most of the side events were held for the conference).  She gave me the time and place, and I knew then what my work for Friday, June 22nd would be:  try to find a way to speak with her about mountaintop removal.

The next morning, I made my way to the Marriot Hotel located at Copacabana beach–one of the many designated bus stops for conference attendees.  Organizers of this gargantuan event ran buses to and from Rio Centro throughout the day from June 20-22 for the UN Conference, Rio+20.  People from throughout the world, women, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), farmers, indigenous people, UN delegates and world leaders had been meeting formally since June 20.  An undercurrent of dissatisfaction surfaced in many conversations and circles in which I found myself.  Major concerns seemed to be a lack of political will on the part of developed nations to assist  developing nations with technology transfer and women were upset that the phase “reproductive rights” no longer appeared in the final document.

At any rate, I was on my way to Rio Centro with hopes of having a moment with Administrator Jackson.

Entrance for all the meetings at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio +20

When I arrived and while going through security (which was beefed up with so many heads of state in Rio), I spotted Emily Thenhaus, an intern with the Loretto Community UN NGO, on her way to a press briefing with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  Coincidentally, it was in the same room where Administrator Jackson was scheduled to speak a little later.  Getting into these formal meetings can be tricky.  Fact is, had I not met up with Emily and trailed behind her and some other US women, I’m not sure I would have been allowed in the room.  I was stopped at the door. Emily looked over her shoulder, saw me stalled and said, “She’s with our U.S. delegation.”

Magical.  I was allowed to pass through the door.

We made our way back to the pavilion area where first Hillary and then Lisa were scheduled to speak.  The room was already crowded. In the back was a bank of reporters waiting for Secretary Clinton to appear; the walls were lined with people and most of the seats had a sheet of paper with the word “reserved” printed in big, bold, black letters.  I spied a single open seat on the back row and settled in for the wait.

Hillary arrived to a barrage of clicking cameras, gave her speech and left.  (I recorded it, but admittedly was preoccupied wondering about how I might be able to speak with Administrator Jackson).  The room emptied out, but I decided to stay put and assess a strategic seat where I could intercept her.  My goal was to thank her for EPA’s role to help rein in mountaintop removal and especially for appealing the recent DC district court decision on the Spruce mine permit and to hand her the summary proceedings from the Central Appalachian Women’s Climate Justice Tribunal and the recent Chicago Women’s Tribunal (which focused on coal plant emissions).

Event organizers asked Emily and me to move closer to the front, which we gladly did (3rd row on the end).  Ms. Jackson was going to speak about the progress of the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, a collaboration that works to decrease short-lived air pollutants like methane, CFCs and black carbon (soot).  To make sure that Jackson would know why I was there to see her, I wore my green “Abolish Mountaintop Removal” t-shirt, the most dressed down I had been for the conference.  Right on time, she arrived; I saw her standing on my left, chatting with what appeared to be some of her staff.  I waited until she was in the front of the room and finished greeting other speakers. Then I saw my opportunity. I turned to Emily and said, “I’m going to go speak to her now.”

Janet presents EPA Administrator Jackson with the report and recommendations from the Central Appalachian Women’s Tribunal on Climate Justice.

Below is a short debrief video that Emily did with me where you can hear how our encounter went: http://lorettoinrio.tumblr.com/post/25659308506/janet-keating-at-the-uns-rio-20-conference-on

And here’s a wonderful photo of Lisa Jackson as she spoke at this event.

I was actually in tears after accomplishing what I set out to do–not sure why, but felt like she spoke from her heart when she said that she appreciated our work and courage.  As I was walking away, she said something like, “I get to go home, but you…”

Admittedly Rio is a bit of a long way to go to get the ear  and attention of the EPA Administrator, but I can’t help but wonder what she was thinking when we spoke–to see someone concerned about mountaintop removal in that room so far from home, wanting to thank her for EPA’s efforts on behalf of the people and the land.  If I were she, I might be inclined to remember that someone representing Central Appalachian women made a big effort  to run into her and maybe in the future she might make a little more effort on behalf of her agency’s efforts to save our mountains.

And here’s a photo of happy me after the event and the brief meet-up with Administrator Jackson:

Janet pauses for a photo op after meeting EPA's Lisa Jackson, happy she accomplished her goal for the day!

You can thank Administrator Jackson for appealing the D.C. court decision by emailing her at:   jackson.lisap@epa.gov.

 

 

 


Jun 202012
 

Below is a statement from the Non-govermental Organizations (NGOs) attending the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development.  Much frustration exists among ordinary people here over the fact that that 20 nations are deciding the fate of 195. Many have been saying that the current document is taking steps backwards from the agreement reach in Rio in 1992. Petitions are circulating today among NGOs asking leaders to take stronger measures to protect the planet and its inhabitants.

A primary ask is to eliminate ALL subsidies to fossil fuel development.   The people have voted that this concern is number one in order to protect our planet, in order to have a sustainable future–to have a future.  For the sake of all life, we must hasten the transition away from fossil fuel extraction to clean, renewable energy.

But there’s still time for leaders to hear the voices of the majority.

More to come…

“We – the civil society organisations and social and justice movements who have responded to the call of the United Nations General Assembly to participate in the Rio+20 process – feel that the current state of negotiations severely threatens the future of all people and undermines the relevance and credibility of the United Nations.

After more than two years of intense negotiations and millions of dollars invested on the UN CSD 2012 Rio+20 conference, governments are unable and unwilling to reaffirm the commitments on fundamental principles they made in Rio in 1992.

Governments must realise that they receive their mandates from their citizenry people and that they must act in its best interest. They must be imbued with a long-term vision, an environmentally-informed mind set, so as to guarantee the sustainable development of civilisations and the best future for all, the future we all really want.

Although governments are apparently unable to resiliently deal with the current global economic crisis (a problem confirmed in the G20 meeting in Mexico this weekend), we believe that this is the perfect moment, with potentially cathartic momentum, to embrace sustainable development, social and environmental justice. This is not the time to abandon it on grounds of austere fiscal policies or allegedly pro-growth pressures in the North. We urge the Government of Brazil, the UNCSD Secretary General and all Member States to stop negotiating their short-term national agendas and to urgently agree now on transitional actions for global sustainable progress.”

We want governments to deliver the people’s legitimate agenda and the realisation of rights, democracy and sustainability, as well as respect for transparency, accountability and the honouring of promises and accomplishments already. Sadly, time is running out. A rushed and weak agreement will be neither acceptable to us nor representative of the future we all want.

We urge our fellow 99% citizens of the world to stand up for the future we really want, and not this one, imposed by a few: the 1% negotiators and their elite constituencies.

For all, let their voices of the majority finally shape the future.

Jun 202012
 

OVEC Executive Director Janet Keating is attending the Rio+20 Earth Summit, going on now in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Keating will present before a panel titled “Organizing for Change: Women’s Tribunals as Civil Society Advocacy.”

She’ll present findings from the Central Appalachian Women’s Tribunal on Climate Justice, which was held May 10 in Charleston, W. Va.

Follow Janet on Twitter @janetovec.

Jun 142012
 

Freshly shorn Rebecca Park with her daughter Beth Ann Bolte. Photo by Andy Park.

A Guest Blog from Charleston, W.Va. resident Rebbeca Park

I have taken a stand against mountaintop removal (MTR). I joined with about a dozen others at the West Virginia State Capitol on Memorial Day and with my mom and my husband Andy watching, I let my daughter Beth Ann buzz my hair down to stubble. As you may imagine, since that moment I have been unable to forget my commitment to this issue! And it has helped me start conversations with complete strangers to hear their thoughts.

Here is an explanation of why I am doing this, and an invitation for you to add your voice to mine (without the loss of your hair).

As a mining method, MTR destroys habitats over thousands of acres as the ridges are clearcut and dynamited. I think of my dad when I see these places and know that he would have grieved for what is destroyed.

Then the rock over the coal seam is pushed into valleys, burying more habitats and disrupting the normal patterns of drainage. Perhaps the worst effect on the people who manage to continue living in the area is the damage to family wells and leaching of heavy metals into their groundwater. And if their narrow valleys flood, the burden of proving that MTR has created or even contributed to the devastation is left to these flood victims.

Residents must also contend with the effects of nearby blasting, heavy dust, heavy equipment on their roads, intimidation if they do not want to sell their property, and the obliteration of their communities. Impoundment ponds (such as the one in the disaster on Buffalo Creek, Logan County and the Martin County KY sludge spill in 2000) are still used to collect the sludge from the washing of the coal, which is not just a nuisance, but is full of poisonous chemicals.

All of this is accomplished with a small percentage of the workforce that would be hired for underground mining. Southern West Virginia does depend on coal for employment, but by arguing that MTR is necessary for those jobs, the industry people are actually lying, because MTR reduces jobs. Drastically.

There are other methods of mining but the industry finds MTR the cheapest method, not just by reducing the labor force, but also because our government under the Bush Administration did not enforce rules and even changed the rules to reducie the coal industry’s responsibilities.

Any industry that ruins and pollutes and then moves on leaves the real costs of their methods to the future, in clean-ups and health care. And in this case, all this devastation is wreaked for maybe 30 more years of cheap air conditioning and lighting locally and cheap energy for industry here and in China and India. Why are we in such a hurry to extract our precious coal and what will become of us in, say 50 years?

This is a liquidation of one of our most important resources, meaning coal becomes cash and guess where the cash goes! Even while they cry about the obstacles to profits, Arch Coal, for instance, raked in $10s of millions in net income in 2011.

There are rules in place, but permits are handled in bits and pieces so that huge projects seem smaller and the total impact is not part of the official discussion. And during the required “hearings” citizens find they are… well simply, not being heard. No matter how well prepared any concerned citizens are, and how respectful they are of the process, there is an attitude that RESIDENTS are the OUTSIDERS to the process, that the industry is right, and objections from the little people are, at most, annoying.

The federal EPA and the state DEP have been pinched between the protective work they need to do and the obvious coal-interests of our elected government–our Congress people, our governor, our legislature. We all know that elections cannot be won anymore with out treasure chests of money, and now entire campaigns can be run for a candidate through super PACs, with unlimited funding from corporations.

The argument to allow mountaintop removal to continue is couched in language like “Obama’s War on Coal,” “Obama’s No Job Zone,” and the stupidly simple alternatives on the bumper stickers “Support coal or sit in the dark.”

More accurately, President Obama has declared a war on pollution. Jobs in mining have increased since the Bush administration. And we CAN insist that coal be mined responsibly, we CAN support pollution control, we CAN support alternative technologies and we CAN conserve electricity. It’s not the either-or light on-lights off situation that the Friends of Coal bumper stickers want to make it.

We have LOTS of choices and alternatives, if we are free to come together and map out the future of the coalfields and determine our energy picture. IF we are listened to. IF we raise our voices instead of being silenced by the money that rents the billboards, buys university athletics, buys our government.

I am for electricity (and for coal mining, though not everyone in this movement is) but I am against mountaintop removal as a method of mining.

Please consider adding your voice to this groundswell of public opinion. Call your representatives in Congress (202-224-3121) and ask them to co-sponsor and support the Clean Water Protection Act, HR 1375. More ideas for speaking up can be found at this really cool website, which is the Alliance for Appalachia website. OVEC is a member of The Alliance.

Jun 142012
 

To follow up on yesterday’s post, here’s a sample letter to copy and paste if you haven’t time to write your own.

Please add your name below (before the reprinted editorial) and e-mail this letter to:

naturalresources@mail.house.gov

Dear Representative Lamborn, Representative Hastings and Subcommittee staff and members:

I wish to submit the following letter for the public Congressional
record of the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight
Hearing on Friday, June 1, 2012, at 10:00 AM, entitled “The Obama
Administration’s Actions Against the Spruce Coal Mine: Canceled
Permits, Lawsuits and Lost Jobs.”

Dear Mr. Lamborn:
After your subcommitttee forced Maria Gunnoe to endure 45 minutes of
police questioning for alleged child pronogrpahy, you and Doc Hastings
need to issue a public apology to Maria Gunnoe, the family of the
young child in the photo, and the photographer.

What is dirty about the photo you refused to allow in the record is
the water – and the practice of mountaintop removal that is making
people sick and destroying their water. You can deny that reality all
you want but that won’t make it go away.

I hope you saw the editorial of June 10 in the Lexington (KY) Herald Leader
(reprinted below). I ask that you include this editorial in the
hearing record.

Sincerely,

Lexington Herald-Leader Editorial

Editorial: EPA should hang tough in coalfields

Published: June 10, 2012

federal enforcement is best hope for protecting kentucky’s water

U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., and his staff owe an apology to
award-winning environmentalist Maria Gunnoe of Boone County, W. Va.

Although, really, in the scheme of wrongs perpetrated against
coalfield residents, a false accusation of child pornography is no
biggie.

Compared with poisoned water, elevated rates of cancer and birth
defects, floods, blasting, ubiquitous dust, close encounters with coal
trucks, poverty and the knowledge that anyone who protests the abuses
is taking a personal risk, the harassment Gunnoe suffered recently at
the U.S. Capitol is just about par for the course.

Someone in Lamborn’s office sicced the Capitol Police on Gunnoe, who
was there to testify before Lamborn’s House Natural Resources
subcommittee. Her offense? She wanted to include in her slide show a
photograph of a Kentucky pre-schooler in a bathtub in the child’s Pike
County home.

The photo stands out from countless family photos of youngsters in
bathtubs because of the water: It’s a nasty burnt orange caused by
pollution of the family’s well by among other things, arsenic, from
nearby coal mining.

Although the family and photographer Katie Falkenberg had given their
permission for the photo to be shown to the committee, they did not
want it reproduced here. Not because they think there’s anything
pornographic about it, but to protect the child, now 9, from any
possible repercussions, in light of the brouhaha.

The episode serves as a perfect metaphor for what we have seen time
and again: Those in power, notably elected officials but also state
regulators, refuse to see what extreme mining is doing to people and
the region.

They’d rather trump up distractions or sling around contrived catch
phrases like “war on coal” than talk about how to ameliorate the
destruction. They have no plans for diversifying the economy.

They shut off concerned citizens such as a delegation of Kentuckians
who tried to meet with U.S. Rep. Hal Rogers last week at his
Washington office to talk about mountaintop removal. Seven of them
were arrested.

Our so-called leaders would rather blame President Barack Obama for
what competition from cheaper, cleaner natural gas is doing to demand
for Appalachian coal than engage in an honest discussion of how to
mine without ruining water.

That dynamic was on full display in Kentucky last week at public
hearings in Frankfort and Pikeville that the Beshear administration
requested from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

At issue are 36 surface mining permits being blocked by the EPA on
what the Beshear administration and industry contend are invalid
grounds. (For perspective, there are 355 active, pre-final reclamation
surface mining permits in effect in Eastern Kentucky right now; the
EPA has not shut down mining.)

Rather than providing a forum for discussing standards for protecting
Kentucky’s water from the toxic fate of the Pike County pre-schooler’s
well, Kentucky pols just wanted to beat up the EPA on the coal
industry’s home court.

So much lame vitriol was spewed against the EPA and those who want to
drink clean water it’s hard to know where to start. One of the zaniest
has to be House Speaker Greg Stumbo’s assertion that the burial of
hundreds of miles of mountain headwaters by the coal industry is
justified by this newspaper’s failure to protest the burial of a creek
in downtown Lexington more than a century ago.

Dig through all the chest-pounding, and you arrive at the central
question: Can Kentucky’s state government be counted on to enforce
coal industry compliance with clean water and other environmental
laws.

Decades of evidence tell us the answer is no.

After questioning Gunnoe, Capitol Police determined no crime had been
committed. Still, she deserves an apology for what she rightly terms
as an attack on her character.

Likewise, the people of the mountains deserve real enforcement of
clean water laws. The only possibility of that happening is for the
EPA to hang tough

Jun 132012
 

This Joel Pett cartoon appeared in the Lexington Herald-Leader on Sunday, June 10

If you haven’t already, please take a few minutes to read this Sunday, June 10 Lexington Herald-Leader editorial, “EPA should hang tough in coalfields.” The paper also published the Joel Pett cartoon, at right, that day.

The editorial tells the story of what happened to OVEC organizer Maria Gunnoe on Capitol Hill on June 1. And it asks that she receive a public apology, as does the staff at the Goldman Prize, the “Green Nobel,” which Maria won in 2009.

In his home district and beyond, Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO) and his staff on the House Natural Resources Committee have been receiving some bad press about the horrid incident.

The Congressional Record for the June 1 hearing is open for two more days. This is a public record, and according to House rules, the public is free to submit letters, documents, and information for the Congressional record of any hearing.

So here’s your chance to turn your outrage over what happened to Maria — a woman who is trying to save our homeplaces, and protect kids and families here – into action.

Write a letter now to the committee and to Mr. Lamborn for the Congressional Record.  Insist on a public apology to the family of the young child in the photo, the photographer and to Maria Gunnoe, whom the committee outrageously detained for police investigation because she wanted the committee to see the photo of a little girl force to bathe in toxic coal pollution. Make sure to include that you wish for your letter to be entered into the Congressional record of the hearing, otherwise your comments won’t be included in the record.

This statement should do the trick:  I wish to submit the following letter for the public Congressional record of the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing on Friday, June 1, 2012, at 10:00 AM, entitled “The Obama Administration’s Actions Against the Spruce Coal Mine: Canceled Permits, Lawsuits and Lost Jobs.”

Send your letter to:  naturalresources@mail.house.gov

Let’s hold Mr. Lamborn and his staff accountable for their sorry actions. Let’s tell his committee that we won’t allow them to continue to deny and distort the truth while taking Big Coal’s dirty money, which it makes from destroying communities, blowing up mountains, and harming families and children, like the one in the photo that Mr. Lamborn refuses to look at. Remember you have until 5 p.m. (Eastern-time) this Friday, June 15 to submit your comments.

Please take the time now to write your message to the committee to tell the members how you feel about how they behaved toward award-winning mountain hero Maria Gunnoe.

Update: Maria says Representative Doc Hastings also needs to be issuing apologies. Please include him in your communication. You can also contact him directly here.

Below are some ideas for messages you could send, but your own words are always the best!

To Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Hastings and House Natural Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee staff:

I wish to submit the following letter for the public Congressional record of the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing on Friday, June 1, 2012, at 10:00 AM, entitled “The Obama Administration’s Actions Against the Spruce Coal Mine: Canceled Permits, Lawsuits and Lost Jobs.”

– What is dirty about the photo you refused to allow in the record is the water – and the practice of mountaintop removal that is making people sick and destroying their water. You can deny that reality all you want but that won’t make it go away.

– Mr Lamborn, Mr. Hastings – I hope you saw the editorial of June 10 in the Lexington paper about your committee’s offensive behavior.  I would like to submit it for the hearing record. (if you choose something along these lines, be sure to include the text of the editorial, available at the link up top).

Send a bathtub photo of your own kids if you have one.  If your baby is not bathing in filth, the message could be something like, “This is my son in the tub.  Fortunately for us, he has clean water in which to bath because we do not live downstream from mountaintop removal.  Please enter this photo and my message for the record of the June 1 subcommittee hearing on the Spruce mine.  If you think this photo of my baby is also pornography you can tell the Capitol Police how to find me.” 

– Mr Lamborn, Mr. Hastings – I hope you saw the editorial cartoon of June 10 in the Lexington paper. As they say, a picture can say a thousand words.  Since you denied the right of citizen activist Maria Gunnoe to place the photo of the girl bathing in mining-polluted water in your committee’s hearing record, I ask that you include this editorial cartoon in the hearing record.

Jun 082012
 

Although my high school days are long gone, one lesson from a biology class stays with me. Warnings from scientists like this underscore the importance of that lesson.

We students conducted an experiment where we inoculated an agar-filled Petri dish with a microorganism. The agar supplied the needs of this microorganism. Each day we used microscopes to count the number of microorganisms. Supplied with all its needs, the microorganism population grew logarithmically, until suddenly there was a massive population dieback.

The microorganisms had used much of their available resources and excreted so much waste that their finite environment could no longer support them. The teacher explained to us that all populations of animals, from amoebas to zebras, can experience the same sort of exponential growth, when resources seem infinite, followed by massive population dieback once resources are depleted and wastes build up.

Of course, balanced ecosystems provide mechanisms to keep populations in balance. But humans are drastically upsetting ecosystems worldwide.

At the same time I was taking that class, photos of Earth taken from space profoundly impacted me. Though it was never said in class, it was obvious that the Earth is humanity’s Petri dish. Humanity is on that path of logarithmic population growth. Our wastes foul the planet and we are eating ourselves alive for something, anything to burn for energy.

The journal Nature, which currently feature’s the warning about Earth’s dire state from the scientists, notes that the Rio+20 Summit offers a second chance for our only home, Earth.

OVEC Executive Director Janet Keating will be at the summit.  Check this blog for updates from Rio.

Update: More than 100 Goldman Environmental Prize winners (including OVEC’s Maria Gunnoe) call on government leaders to take risks at Rio Earth Summit, commit to sustainable development

Jun 062012
 

Larry Gibson shaves Paula Swearigen’s locks during May 31 End MTR protest. Photo by Janet Keating.

This morning residents from West Virginia joined residents from three other states severely impacted by mountaintop removal coal mining in congressional office sit-ins in protest of their congressional representatives’ refusal to protect their communities from the extreme impacts of mountaintop removal. Constituents are currently occupying the offices of Congressmen Nick Rahall (D-WV), Hal Rogers (R-KY), Morgan Griffith (R-VA) and Jimmy Duncan (R-TN).

Read more herePlease support them by joining the End Mountaintop Removal National Call-In Day today. Follow the action on Twitter: #StopMTR  #AppRising

Some quotes from folks on the ground in D.C. follow:

“After seven years of going in circles, asking just for basic protections for our people and being blocked by our own Representatives who are supposed to be passing legislation to protect our district, we don’t see any other way. Appalachia deserves better,” said Teri Blanton of Hal Roger’s district in Eastern Kentucky.

“Representative Rahall is not taking these studies or our health seriously. If they could actually see these waters, see what’s been done to our homes, see the children that are sick and the people that are dying, then maybe they’d be willing to do something about it,” said Donna Branham of Mingo County, West Virginia.

“I have been trying since 2009 just to talk to Representative Hal Rogers about the horrors of mountaintop removal. I’ve sent him letters, and tried to get meetings with him,” said Stanley Sturgill, a retired underground coal miner from Lynch, Ky. “I’m here for my health, to try to keep what little bit I have left. I’m here for my family, my children, and my grandchildren to try to keep a decent place for them to live. They deserve that and we’re not getting that with the things happening in the mountains.”

“It’s my belief that I have to be ready to go to any length to bring out the change that is required. If arrest is part of that, I’m willing to do that. A lot of people are going through a lot worse trials and tribulations because of mountaintop removal than spending a little time in jail,” said Patrick Morales of Tennessee. “I want Representative Duncan of Tennessee to examine his conscience honestly, and come up with some moral justification for his support of mountaintop removal and share that with me.”

“I never thought I would be cutting my hair off on the West Virginia Capitol steps. I never thought I would be in D.C. talking to Congress, and I never thought I would be risking arrest. But as a mother, I would cut off my foot for my children. As a mother, whatever it takes, I will do it for my children,” said Paula Swearingen of West Virginia, “And I will not allow mountaintop removal to continue to poison my children.”

“I told Congressman Duncan that he should know better than to get between a mother and the safety and health of her children. I am so frustrated that Congress allows coal companies to destroy our mountains and our health. I would do anything to protect the health of my children and grandchildren,” said Vickie Terry of Tennessee.

“We have no choice,” said Jane Branham of Virginia. “My health is failing; we have some very elderly people with us today. It is very hard for us to come all this way. But we are here, fighting for our very survival.”

“We came here to let people know, in this nation and around the world, that the people of Appalachia count,” said Larry Gibson of Kayford Mountain, W. Va. “We count. We aren’t going to be dismissed. We aren’t going to be ignored any longer. We count. We may have a little twang to our voice, but our mind and our soul is equal to everybody else’s. There ain’t no twangs there. We come here to make a statement and let people know, in Appalachia and the extractive communities, that they’re not alone anymore.”

Jun 062012
 

Congressman Doug Lamborn (middle) (R-CO) stares at Maria Gunnoe (hair only visible in foreground, left) during another hearing his committee hosted on Sept. 26, 2011 in Charleston, W.Va. More info here: http://ohvec.org/newsletters/woc_2011_12/. Photo by Vivian Stockman.

“I accept the judgment of professional staff,” Lamborn said Tuesday. “If it’s inappropriate, I don’t think I should be viewing it. The fewer people who viewed it, the better.”

That from Rep. Lamborn in a Denver Post article this morning titled  “Rep. Lamborn panel blocks bath photo over child-porn concerns.

He also said, “If it’s inappropriate, I don’t think I should be viewing it. The fewer people who viewed it, the better.”

Guess that backfired.

The Colorado Springs Gazette ran a story, too, “Lamborn panel axes photo of child bathing in polluted water,” and it’s among the paper’s “most viewed” stories so far today.

Remember, today is the National End Mountaintop Removal Call-In Day.  Please make the call.

If you tweet, please follow us @OVEC_WV and re-tweet about the call-in day.